The theme of 'copyright', in its apparent softness compared to the dramatic demands posed by social dynamics, it may be curious to capture some key characteristics of our post-post-modern .. .
first suggests to me a double-cue
on the current ontology of 'work': More than autonomous from its author, it has gone away is definitely not just for its reproducibility, but also for the loss of uniqueness that comes from a
multiplicity of use - the role of the market, coming to manage all aspects of human productivity, including art, folk the law itself (in the case pecification, demanding a Copyrigth)
Copyright and / or usufruct right?
this 'versus' symbolizes a while the core of all conflicts that we find in the social and relational: what is the limit to my freedom? which begins on your right?
are convinced that the only possible answer to these questions is a new logic , the business plan where to move beyond the paradigm of homo economicus, which has now shown all of its major limitations on the civil-like, as well as affective .
So I believe we must move on principle solipsistic 'homo homini lupus',' not what you would not do to another have done to you 'to marry another vision, and fraternal and really consider each other as another' me ';
my liberty ends where that of the other but our freedoms can only come together and get excited each other ..
the logic of the gift.
'copyright' .. the concept is understood even laudable, because it implies recognition of a value, that value lies in human hands. Of course, a work may have been created for many purposes, but the term 'work' I refer to those creations that are children of the desire to offer himself to another, 'work' as discovery and realization of the in the search for recognition and the relationship with the other. In my illusion man's work should always be directed to this, the promotion of 'the whole person. So each work would be a 'masterpiece', but something particular, being an expression of humanity, making communication possible, it would also universal, because all we share as human beings.
In this new sense of 'work' as not to assume as a corollary to the need for access to the fruition of the work?
0 comments:
Post a Comment